by Kyler Rasmussen | Dec 8, 2021 |
After summarizing the strongest pieces of evidence we’ve considered in our statistical journey, we discuss what we can conclude from our Bayesian analyses. Though that evidence doesn’t represent unassailable proof for the Restoration and all it entails, what it does is show how belief in an authentic Book of Mormon can be reasonable, which supports further reasoned belief in God and Christ. ...
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Nov 24, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that the Book of Mormon could have so many names that can be traced to ancient Semitic and Egyptian, and for those ancient meanings to form wordplays and other connections with the text itself. There’s been a substantial amount of faithful scholarship looking at the dozens of unique personal and geographic names in the Book of Mormon, scholarship that purports to find a large number of interesting connections with Semitic and Egyptian languages. ...
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Nov 10, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that the similarities we can observe between Egyptian/Semitic and Uto-Aztecan languages could have arisen by chance. Few Book of Mormon-related discoveries have had as much impact or have generated as much controversy as Brian Stubbs’ proposal connecting Egyptian and Semitic with the Uto-Aztecan languages of northern Mexico and the southwest U.S. ...
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Oct 27, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that Joseph could keep the Book of Mormon’s complex geographical details straight without committing frequent and obvious errors, particularly while dictating the text in a single draft. The Book of Mormon details a complex world, referencing over 101 different cities and geographical features tied together in a dense web of over 150 unique geographic relationships. ...
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Oct 13, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that an allegedly fraudulent text could become more plausible after decades of intense critical examination. Over time, critics of the Book of Mormon have unearthed dozens of anachronisms and alleged historical errors within the book’s pages. In their turn, faithful scholars have demonstrated that most of those criticisms are unfounded, leading the book’s plausibility to increase substantially as the decades have passed....
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Sep 29, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that the Book of Mormon could have so many examples of chiasmus if it was written by Joseph. Chiasmus has been a mainstay of Book of Mormon apologetics for more than five decades, but the ease with which chiasmus can be found in just about any book has led some to doubt its utility as evidence for the Book of Mormon. ...
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Sep 15, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that someone could fake stylometric evidence for multiple authors within the Book of Mormon text. Stylometric evidence regarding the Book of Mormon has been around for almost four decades now. It made a bit of a splash back in the 80s, but it seems to be plagued by dismissal from critics and ambivalence from the faithful....
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Sep 1, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that Joseph or his scribes could fill the Book of Mormon with examples of grammar and word use that fit better in Early Modern English than in the nineteenth century. Stanford Carmack and Royal Skousen have painstakingly documented a strange argument—that much of the language used in the Book of Mormon reflects usage patterns that align with the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, making it unlikely that Joseph or anyone else in the nineteenth century authored the book. ...
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Aug 18, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that Joseph could guess the name Nahom by chance alone, or that he could've gotten that location from a map. The site of Nahom has been touted as solid archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon, but it’s hard to know exactly how strong that evidence actually is. Could Joseph have guessed the name by chance? ...
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Aug 4, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that the witnesses to the Book of Mormon could give such bold and straightforward testimony to an apparent fraud, particularly if those witnesses proved true to their testimony as time passed....
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Dec 1, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that the Book of Abraham would disagree with what the most learned academic minds would have to say on the subject, or that a fraudulent one could produce any degree of agreement with an accurate translation....
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Nov 17, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that Book of Mormon place names would be so similar to places in the area around Palmyra. In the early 1990s, a map presented by Vernal Holley purported to show place names in a broad area around Palmyra that were present in an altered fashion within the Book of Mormon. ...
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Nov 3, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that God would allow his prophets and scriptural texts to err as frequently as they do. Some point to the verifiable mistakes of modern prophets, or apparent mistakes in the Book of Mormon, as evidence that the church or the book are inauthentic and uninspired. ...
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Oct 20, 2021 |
It seems unlikely than an ancient book would have so many themes and ideas common to the early nineteenth century. Most critics will be quick to point out that the Book of Mormon contains elements that correspond to nineteenth-century religious and cultural thinking....
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Oct 6, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that an authentic Book of Mormon should have so many anachronisms—or that a fabricated book could correspond so well to Mesoamerican culture. In this episode we take a bite that’s probably too large to be reasonably chewed, looking at what we might possibly conclude from decades of archaeological research on the Book of Mormon....
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Sep 22, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that the Book of Mormon should show so many parallels to nineteenth-century books if it was really an authentic ancient work. Critics have established a bit of a cottage industry when it comes finding potential books from which Joseph could have plagiarized the Book of Mormon. Though there are a number of books that could be considered, we focus here on two of the main candidates: A View of the Hebrews and The Late War. ...
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Sep 8, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that an independent translation of Isaiah could be so similar to the King James text, while at the same time different from it in such apparently fraudulent ways. Much has been made of the material shared between the Book of Mormon and the 1769 King James Bible, in the Isaiah chapters and elsewhere, with the implication that the material was plagiarized by Joseph as he was writing the Book of Mormon. ...
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Aug 25, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that Nephi could have built and sailed a boat from the Arabian Peninsula to the New World. Though some critics have labeled Nephi’s voyage as an impossibility, those perceptions are largely based on the assumption that Nephi had to have built a Renaissance-style sailing vessel, as if the Nina, Pinta, or the Santa Maria were Nephi’s only options....
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Aug 11, 2021 |
It doesn’t seem likely that a true God could teach things that people find personally and politically disagreeable. Critics find no shortage of ways to be offended by mainstream LDS thought and philosophy, whether it’s in the policies of the church or the content of the Book of Mormon. ...
read more
by Kyler Rasmussen | Jul 28, 2021 |
It seems unlikely that the colonization of the American continent described in the Book of Mormon would’ve left no genetic evidence in modern (or ancient) Indigenous populations.
Critics of the Book of Mormon can be relied on to bring up the subject of DNA, even though most on both sides have little expertise with which to grapple with the argument.
...read more