Neal Rappleye
Jasmin Rappleye
Hales Swift
You can listen to or download the May 2 broadcast of the Interpreter Radio Show below. It will also be included in our podcast feed (https://interpreterfoundation.org/feeds/podcast). The hosts were Neal Rappleye, Jasmin Rappleye, and Hales Swift. In this episode, our hosts discussed controversies with an outspoken critic of the Church of Jesus Christ, the temples in Manti and Ephraim as well as new Interpreter papers. The second portion of the show was a roundtable discussing the upcoming Come Follow Me lesson #24 (D&C 63). The Interpreter Radio Show can be heard Sunday evenings from 7 to 9 PM (MDT), on K-TALK, AM 1640, or you can listen live on the Internet at ktalkmedia.com. Call in to 801-254-1640 with your questions and comments during the live show.
Original air date: May 2, 2021. This recording has been edited to remove commercial breaks.
 |
Podcast: Download (Duration: 1:42:54 — 11.8MB) |
The Interpreter Radio Show is a weekly discussion of matters of interest to the hosts, guests, and callers of the show. The views expressed on the Interpreter Radio Show are those of the individuals involved and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Interpreter Foundation, nor should statements made on the show be construed as official doctrinal statements of the Church.
I agree with Jann. The team did a great job of keeping us informed on the “wolf in sheep’s clothing”, Dehlin. They certainly could have given even more detail, but gave enough information to keep everyone informed about how Karma works. Thanks for the broadcast.
Great discussion as always. You three are so much fun to hear. I appreciate your insights. I think it is important that you do discuss what is going on as far as those apostatizing because they have influence so many of our friends and family. And I can’t keep up with it all so I really appreciate your help and understanding what’s been going on.
I suppose I listened to 10 minutes of the broadcast before deciding to move on. Listening to the sad tale of a former member turned critic of the Church and his transgressions (in addition to apostasy) is just not a matter of interest to me. Yes, I know it speaks to the character and credibility of this person and his attacks upon the Church, but I really think you could have made your point with only brief comment or two, and then move on.